I am a disaffected Democrat, and one of the main reasons for that is the party's position on Social Security. They can't seem to admit that Social Security has a major problem. Just ignoring the Social Security liability (or denying its existence) is not an option.
The $12 Trillion in accumulated surpluses (the "Trust Fund") is not cash (nor could it be - that is practically the US GDP). It is a collection of US treasury bonds. When 2018 comes around, the Social Security Administration will go to the Treasury Department and ask them them to pay up (The US government is both the holder and the creditor of these bonds - this could be a problem).$12 trillion is the equivalent of about 5 federal budgets. To this should be added the liabilities of Medicare (also trillions of dollars of liabilities).
Whanever I see Democratic leaders confronted by these facts, their response is say that Social Security is "fully funded until 2156 or something" and they never expect anyone to ask a follow up question: "fully funded" by what?
The party needs ideas here, not denial. Where are they?
· WI-08: Wingnut plans to run as "conservative independent" (desmoinesdem)
· 50 percent of southerners say Obama better president than Bush (desmoinesdem)
· What Yesterday Says About Young Voters (Mike Connery)
· Max Blumenthal on the dysfunctional movement driving the GOP (Mike Connery)
· IA-Gov: Culver launches second tv ad (desmoinesdem)
· Hilarious Vid On Why We Must Vote No On Issue 2!! (Cliff Schecter)
· NY-23: Scozzafava Drops Out! (lipris)
· NY-23: Pataki Goes Rogue, Endorses Teabagger Darling Doug Hoffman (lipris)
· Dunne Considering Run For VT-Gov (Nathan Empsall)
· McGovern Grandson Looks to Challenge Thune in 2010 (Jonathan Singer)
· IA-03: Two potential challengers for Boswell (desmoinesdem)
· NJ-Gov: Daggett Goes After Christie and Corzine (Jonathan Singer)
